Groundwork for Reform: What Maryland Can Learn from Grand Junction’s Foundation Repair Policies
As policymakers across the U.S. grapple with aging infrastructure, housing instability, and climate resilience, one area has remained notably under-discussed in Maryland’s public policy discourse: residential foundation integrity. While often viewed as a private homeowner issue, unstable foundations have far-reaching public consequences—affecting everything from health outcomes to housing affordability to neighborhood safety.
In Grand Junction, Colorado, local governments, contractors, and property owners have developed a proactive and collaborative approach to foundation repair. Their strategy not only protects housing stock but also provides a clear blueprint for how Maryland can modernize its housing policy with an eye toward long-term resilience and cost-effective solutions.
We recently met with a Grand Junction company owner (see details here) about policy changes.
THE HIDDEN COST OF NEGLECTING FOUNDATIONS
Maryland’s varied terrain, humid climate, and aging infrastructure all contribute to a growing concern over structural damage in residential buildings. Many older homes across the state—particularly in Baltimore City, Prince George’s County, and rural areas—are showing signs of foundation wear, such as settling, cracking, or water intrusion.

These issues are more than cosmetic. Shifting foundations can lead to mold growth, rodent infestations, sewer backups, and increased energy bills. Worse still, neglected foundation damage often spreads, impacting neighboring properties and lowering property values at the community level.
Despite these risks, Maryland currently lacks consistent statewide policy around foundation inspection, reporting, and repair incentives. Homeowners often bear the full burden, while local governments are left managing the fallout—from code violations to emergency housing placements.
A MODEL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY IN GRAND JUNCTION
In contrast, Grand Junction has taken a forward-thinking approach. Local agencies and licensed contractors in the area emphasize early detection and intervention—often working together to provide free or low-cost assessments in neighborhoods most at risk for soil shifting or groundwater damage.
Companies like Foundation Repair Grand Junction focus on long-term structural stability, offering services such as pier systems, wall anchoring, crawl space encapsulation, and drainage correction. These interventions are often recommended before a crisis point, reducing emergency repairs and mitigating future costs.
Just as important, Grand Junction’s policies and contractor networks prioritize community education. Homeowners receive clear information on warning signs, repair timelines, and financing options—ensuring that structural safety is not just a luxury for the wealthy.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR POLICYMAKERS IN MARYLAND
There are several ways Maryland can adapt Grand Junction’s approach to build a safer and more resilient housing ecosystem:
- Incentivize Preventive Inspections: Offering tax credits or rebates to homeowners who complete foundation inspections and repairs could catch structural issues early and save millions in emergency assistance down the line.
- Establish Regional Risk Mapping: Soil composition, groundwater levels, and historical settlement data can be used to create risk maps, allowing local governments to proactively address vulnerable neighborhoods.
- Support Low-Income Homeowners: Partnering with local contractors and nonprofits to offer subsidized repairs could help stabilize aging housing stock, especially in low-income areas where foundation issues often go unaddressed.
- Strengthen Building Codes and Enforcement: Updating Maryland’s building codes to require proper grading, waterproofing, and structural drainage for new construction could prevent future issues while raising standards for safe housing.
- Educate the Public: A state-backed campaign focused on foundation health could help demystify the process for homeowners and encourage preventive action—much like public initiatives for lead paint or radon.
These strategies would not only improve safety and property values, but also reduce the long-term burden on public infrastructure and emergency housing programs.
INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY STARTS AT HOME
Too often, infrastructure policy focuses on roads, bridges, and public utilities—ignoring the private structures that form the foundation of our neighborhoods, quite literally. Yet the cost of inaction on residential structural issues can be just as devastating, particularly in under-resourced communities.
By integrating foundation repair into its broader housing and infrastructure policy framework, Maryland can lead with a holistic view of what resilient, livable communities require. The experience of Grand Junction proves that this is not only possible but practical—and that the private sector can be a powerful ally when aligned with the public interest.
CONCLUSION: LAYING THE FOUNDATION FOR SMARTER HOUSING POLICY
Maryland’s future housing policy must include the often-invisible issues that impact families every day—like the stability of the very ground beneath them. Grand Junction offers a tested model of proactive, collaborative foundation repair policy that protects homeowners, preserves community integrity, and saves taxpayer dollars in the long run.
With the right mix of incentives, education, and policy reform, Maryland has an opportunity to reinforce not just its homes, but its values—building a more secure and equitable future from the ground up.